Dislocation CPT Codes: Traumatic vs Non-traumatic

Question:

Is it appropriate to report CPT code 28645 for both traumatic and non-traumatic dislocations?

Answer:

Yes, CPT code 28645 (Open treatment of metatarsophalangeal joint dislocation, includes internal fixation, when performed) may be reported whether the nature of the dislocation is traumatic or non-traumatic, as long as the dislocation required an open treatment. The diagnosis code will differentiate the condition as traumatic or non-traumatic.

Four CPT codes exist for the treatment of metatarsophalangeal joint dislocations. Report the appropriate code based on the type of treatment:28630: Closed treatment, no anesthesia required28635: Closed treatment, anesthesia required28636: Percutaneous treatment, with manipulation28645: Open treatment, with internal fixation, when performed

*This response is based on the best information available as of 01/09/20.

Periacetabular Osteotomy

Question:

We have a new pediatric orthopaedic surgeon who has joined our practice. He recently performed periacetabular osteotomies for hip dysplasia. He wants us to report CPT codes 27228 and 27146 x3 for this procedure based on information he received during his fellowship training. We have told him that we must report an unlisted CPT code. Will you advise if we can report the codes he suggests, or is the unlisted CPT code correct?

Answer:

There are two options to report this service based on whether the payor follows Medicare rules or not:

• From a CPT standpoint, the correct Category I CPT code is 27299 (Unlisted procedure, pelvis or hip joint).
• A Level III HCPCS code exists (S2115 Osteotomy, periacetabular, with internal fixation) for payors who recognize S codes; Medicare does not recognize these level three codes. These codes were commonly referred to as “local codes” and are not published in the CPT manual.

CPT code 27228 (Open treatment of acetabular fracture(s) involving anterior and posterior (two) columns, includes T-fracture and both column fracture with complete articular detachment, or single column or transverse fracture with associated acetabular wall fracture, with internal fixation) is incorrect, as the physician is not treating a fracture.

CPT code 27146 (Osteotomy, iliac, acetabular or innominate bone;) is also incorrect, as the surgeon is not performing a single osteotomy of any one of these bones; the surgeon is performing multiple osteotomies, or cuts in the acetabulum.

*This response is based on the best information available as of 12/05/19.

E/M and Fracture Manipulation

Question:

We have joined a new health system and the coding staff members (new to orthopaedics) are removing all E/M-57 services when reported with a fracture manipulation code. The coding staff members are stating these are inclusive to the fracture, as the physician has to evaluate the patient to determine if the fracture needs manipulation. After many conversations, they agreed to hear from others on whether or not the E/M is separately reportable.

Answer:

Congratulations to your team for working with and educating the new coding team to the world of orthopaedics.

If the documentation supports the E/M service, it is reportable when assessing a fracture that resultantly requires manipulation.

The patient may present with a known fracture (or not). The physician must evaluate the patient to determine the nature of the injury. X-rays are typically ordered and interpreted, or reviewed if taken at an outside facility. The physician diagnoses the fracture as displaced requiring manipulation, whether it will be treated with closed or open reduction. The E/M service associated with evaluating a patient with a fracture is not included in global fracture care.

Append modifier 57 to the E/M CPT code if the treatment of the fracture is performed on the same day or the day following the E/M service.Note, although CPT rules call for using modifier 57 when you are protecting an E/M service performed for a procedure with a 90 day global period, some payors may instead require modifier 25 when the fracture treatment does not require taking the patient to the OR.

*This response is based on the best information available as of 10/17/19.

Hematoma I&D with Fasciotomy

Question:

Our surgeon performed an I&D of a hematoma in the same compartment as an anterior and lateral fasciotomy in the leg for compartment syndrome. I submitted a code for the I&D in addition to the fasciotomy code and the surgeon removed the I&D code, stating it would be inclusive to the fasciotomy. I don’t feel this is correct. Is the I&D inclusive?

Answer:

KZA agrees with the surgeon based upon the information presented in your scenario. The drainage of a hematoma in the same compartment(s) as the fasciotomy is inclusive to the fasciotomy code(s).

*This response is based on the best information available as of 10/03/19.

Nail and Lesion Debridement During the Same Visit

Question:

A patient presents to the office who meets Medicare’s definition for medical necessity for routine foot care. Nails are noted to be elongated and thickened, and hyperkeratotic lesions are noted to be on the right plantar heel and right foot second metatarsal head. The podiatrist debrides all ten nails and trims two lesion sites. Is it appropriate to use modifier 59 to unbundle 11721 and 11056?

Answer:

Yes. In the scenario you describe, both services are reportable under both CPT definitions of codes 11721 and 11056 and CMS NCCI edits and narrative guidelines.

From a CPT standpoint, your question describes two different services; debridement of nails and trimming of skin lesions.

The most recent change to the NCCI guideline was published in 2018, and remains in effect in 2019. It states:

NCCI has a procedure to procedure edit with column one CPT code 11055 (paring or cutting of benign hyperkeratotic lesion…) and column two CPT code 11720 (debridement of nail(s) by any method; 1 to 5). Modifier 59 shall not be used to bypass the edit if these two procedures are performed on the same distal phalanxincluding the skin overlying the distal interphalangeal joint.Source: NCCI 2019, Chapter 3, Section E

Your question includes similar procedures, but for a greater number of sites (11056 is used for paring or cutting of 2-4 benign hyperkeratotic lesions, while 11055 is for a single lesion and 11721 is used for debridement of 6 or more nails, while 11720 is used for 1-5 nails).

Under the NCCI guideline, the determining factor is whether the hyperkeratotic lesion is located on the same distal phalanx, including the skin over the distal interphalangeal joint. When that situation exists, it is not appropriate to use modifier 59 to bypass the NCCI edit between codes 11720 and 11055, (or 11721 and 11056).

In your scenario, the lesions are at the plantar heel and at the second metatarsal head; based on their locations, separate reporting would be allowed, and the Column 2 code, 11721, could be reported with modifier 59.

*This response is based on the best information available as of 08/22/19.

Superior Capsular Reconstruction

Question:

What CPT codes do I use for comparison when the surgeon performs a superior capsular reconstruction? I know I have to use an unlisted code.

Answer:

Great job in knowing that this procedure is reported with an unlisted code. The AAOS recommends comparing this procedure to CPT codes 29827 and 29806.  Remember, the unlisted code is reported on the claim form; it is important to notate box 19 of the claim form the name of the procedure and the comparison codes for the unlisted code, 29999.

*This response is based on the best information available as of 07/11/19.