Intracranial Cerebral Venogram

Question:

How is an Intracranial cerebral venogram coded?

Answer:

Venous catheterization, with the catheter advanced into the intracanal venous circulation, is reported with code 36012, second order venous catheterization.  The venous imaging is typically a superior sagittal sinus venogram, 75780.

*This response is based on the best information available as of 2/1/24.

Coding Question on a Diagnosis

Question:

What is Actinic Keratosis and what procedure is used to treat this condition?

Answer:

Actinic Keratoses is an extremely common dermatological condition among the elderly. It is suspected to be a pre-malignant condition. The condition presents as rough, sometimes red, scaly patches on the skin, typically where there has been exposure from the sun. Common areas are the face, scalp, neck, ears, forearms, and hands. While they are mostly benign lesions, most squamous cell carcinomas begin as actinic keratoses, making it preferable to remove or destroy them before it can progress into malignancy. Treatment for Actinic Keratoses is cryotherapy which is a destruction.

The procedure to destroy or remove actinic keratoses are generally covered by Medicare and commercial payers. The CPT code to report actinic keratosis destruction is 17000 for the first lesion, 17003 for the second through 14th lesions (each lesion) and 17004 for 15 lesions or more and is reported only once. The diagnosis code for Actinic Keratosis is L57.0.

*This response is based on the best information available as of 2/1/24.

Coding Laparoscopic Liver Biopsy

Question:

How is a laparoscopic biopsy of the liver reported. Can we use code 47001, Biopsy of liver?

Answer:

47001 Biopsy of liver, needle; when done for indicated purpose at time of other major procedure (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) may only be reported with an open procedure. See CPT Assistant 1992 below. If a laparoscopic biopsy of the liver is performed at the same time as another laparoscopic procedure, for example a laparoscopic cholecystectomy, report an unlisted code (47379). There is no CPT code for a laparoscopic liver biopsy.

*This response is based on the best information available as of 2/1/24.

Fracture Documentation Inquiry

Question:

Recently a surgeon of ours documented the following for a patient evaluated in our office.

HPI: Right lateral depressed tibial plateau fracture

X- rays: Review of CT and X-Ray shows, “lateral split depressed right tibial plateau fracture with 8mm of lateral joint line depression.”

Diagnosis: Closed fracture of right tibial plateau, initial encounter

Plan: ORIF of tibial shaft fracture noting the joint instability

The coding staff assigned a level 3 encounter to this, and the surgeon is questioning why a displaced fracture requiring surgery would be considered low versus moderate risk for the problem addressed. The surgeon submitted a level four encounter and the staff down coded to a level three. Are you able to comment?

Answer:

Thank you for sending this via our ongoing consulting agreement and agreeing to use this as a coding coach.

• Our first answer is to remind the providers, when possible, to address the complexity (risk) of the problem.

• Second, the staff should query the provider if they do not understand the type of fracture and associated risk.

• Third, the surgeon gave a diagnosis of a closed fracture of the right tibial plateau, initial encounter.

When speaking with the physician, a recommendation to document the diagnosis as “displaced fracture of lateral condyle of right tibia, initial encounter for closed fracture, initial encounter” to better describe the fracture that occurred.

The AMA has defined the Problems Addressed that would be pertinent to this condition as

1. Acute uncomplicated injury

2. Acute complicated injury with risk of complications, morbidity, or mortality.

Work with the surgeon to best determine the risk associated with the fracture. This is a great example of where enhanced documentation and speaking with the surgeon has benefits for both.

Additionally, the surgeon stated he reviewed the CT and XR and documented the findings. Remember to remind the surgeon of the difference between reviewing X-Rays and performing an independent interpretation—they are different and impact the level of risk in the MDM table.

*This response is based on the best information available as of 2/1/24.

E&M with Injections: Two Diagnoses

Question:

If we have an established patient where the physician evaluates the patient and decides to give an injection. The physician documents two diagnoses. May we report an E&M with the injection because we have two diagnoses?

Answer:

An E&M is reportable with the injection when the significant separate service rules are met.

Two answers apply:

1. We do not recommend reporting the E&M if the second diagnosis is at same location or joint that is being injected.  In this case, a second diagnosis does not meet the “separate service” part of the modifier 25 definition.
2. We recommend reporting the E&M-25 if the second diagnosis if:
   1. The second diagnosis is in a separate anatomic location from the injection site, and
   2. The second condition is evaluated and managed.

Intracranial Endovascular Venous Thrombectomy

Question:

How is an Intracranial endovascular venous thrombectomy coded?

Answer:

There are no intracranial venous endovascular codes, so this must be reported as an unlisted code, 64999.  If performed and documented, a venogram, and the venous catheterization may also be reported.

*This response is based on the best information available as of 12/28/23.